mfk003

Mark Kurd, MD

Contact Dr. Kurd

850 Old Lancaster Avenue
Suite 100
Bryn Mawr, PA 19010

1-800-321-9999

Most Recent Peer-reviewed Publications

  1. Sacral Fractures and Associated Injuries
  2. Answer to the Letter to the Editor of A. Piazzolla et al. concerning, “The Surgical Algorithm for the AOSpine, Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System” by A. R. Vaccaro et al.; Eur Spine J (2016); 25(4):1087–1094
  3. Cervical spine surgery complications and risks in the elderly
  4. Comparing the Treatment Algorithm and Complications for Patients Undergoing an Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion at a Physician-Owned Specialty Hospital and a University-Owned Tertiary Care Hospital
  5. The role of multimodal analgesia in spine surgery
  6. The Effect of Dynamic Versus Static Plating Systems on Fusion Rates and Complications in 1-Level and/or 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
  7. Lumbar spinal stenosis: How is it classified?
  8. The Development of a Universally Accepted Sacral Fracture Classification: A Survey of AOSpine and AOTrauma Members
  9. The economic implications of an incidental durotomy
  10. Immobilization following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: Evidence-based approach
  11. The surgical algorithm for the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system
  12. Use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis
  13. Performing an Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
  14. Minimally invasive/less invasive microdiscectomy
  15. Should Displaced Sacral Fractures Be Treated by an Orthopedic Traumatologist or a Spine Surgeon?
  16. Microdiscectomy for a paracentral lumbar herniated disk
  17. A change in direction and a name change: The journal of spinal disorders and techniques is now clinical spine surgery
  18. Is it necessary to extend a multilevel posterior cervical decompression and fusion to the upper thoracic Spine?
  19. Magnetic resonance imaging following spine trauma
  20. Fusion in degenerative spondylolisthesis: comparison of osteoconductive and osteoinductive bone graft substitutes